UBlock Origin for Safari used to be a thing as well, but since Safari 12 content blockers don't work as reliable in Safari anymore. In my opinion it is the best content- (and ad-) blocker available. Beware that uBlock is something different than uBlock Origin (use the provided link above). It is not commercialized, maintained by the community and free to use. UBlock origin is a wide-spectrum blocker and provides exactly the functionality you need. Hereafter, my reasoning and a more detailed answer to your question. That is the short - in your face - answer. You can’t address that with a browser plugin!įinally, blocking these elements at the network level will free up quite a chunk of bandwidth you didn’t even realize was being consumed by advertising domains and trackers. One of the benefits of using this approach was finding and blocking advertising domains things like my SmartTV (Samsung and LG)or internet connected radio (Sonus) were communicating with. PiHole and pfBlockerNG use a different model, called “freemium.” The product is available for free, but premium services (like support or real-time black list updates) are available for a fee. “Free” usually has a cost associated with it and it’s usually your privacy. However, most important for me is the privacy aspect where plugins ask for access to things like your location, your browsing history and even your contacts. Additionally, there's no overhead you CPU needs yo deal with, even if it is negligible. Since they operate at the network layer and will protect your whole network rather than just a single browser. (IMO) these are much better than browser plugins. For instance, I use the community version for home and the subscription model for work and for my clients. So depending on your needs and risk tolerance, it could be a free solution. A more up-to-date and thorough list is available via subscription. What do these things do?īlock elements at the network level based on a community supported blacklist. While I’ve done some preliminary experiments with it, I opted for pfBlockerNG because I’m a BSD guy and not much of a Linux fan. PiHole is a really interesting product in that it’s small enough to run on a Raspberry Pi or various other Linux distros. Though, I’ve never tried running pfBlocker on macOS. pf is also the default firewall found on macOS. I personally use pfBlockerNG because I’m a big proponent of pfSense firewall routers (as well as FreeBSD). However, it would be a spectacular time suck trying continually maintain it.Ī better (and my preferred) option is to do something at the network level and use pfBlockerNG or piHole. Before I spend hours on this, is this doable?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |